Voice of San DiegoIndependent & Insightful
SEARCH
Make us your homepage  |  Sign-up for the free E-Mail Newsletter  
Latest Letters
Letters: City Government
Letters: Education
Letters: General
Letters: Mayoral Race
Letters: Redevelopment
Letters: Transportation
Home
About Us
Ask a Question
Submit Letters
Sections
Archives
Arts & Culture
Border Issues
Business
Cartoons
Contributing Voices
Daily Buzz
Education
Environment
Government
Health
Housing
Letters to the Editor
Lifestyle
Local Events
Mayoral Race
Partners
People
Regional Talk
SD in the News
Single in San Diego
Sports
Technology
Transportation
May 15, 6:12 PM EDT

Arizona sheriff faces prospect of more court oversight


AP Photo
AP Photo/Ross D. Franklin

PHOENIX (AP) -- As he seeks a seventh term in office, the sheriff of metro Phoenix faces the prospect of greater oversight of his agency from a judge who ruled that the lawman has disobeyed his orders in a racial profiling case.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio was found to be in civil contempt of court for violating court orders, such as letting his officers conduct immigration patrols 18 months after the judge barred them. The decision brings Arpaio one step closer to a possible criminal contempt case that could expose him to fines and even jail time.

The sheriff was put under court supervision after the judge ruled nearly three years ago that Arpaio's officers had profiled Latinos. In response, the judge imposed an overhaul on the agency, including giving officers training on how to conduct constitutional traffic stops.

U.S. District Judge Murray Snow is now considering whether to invalidate several internal investigations into alleged wrongdoing and mismanagement by sheriff's employees and get an independent investigator to re-examine the allegations.

The contempt ruling on Friday said Arpaio deliberately misstated facts last year when he denied in court that he had conducted an investigation of the judge.

It offered a bruising critique of Arpaio's efforts to conduct his internal investigations, saying disciplinary actions are sometimes decided by employees who are biased and have conflicts of interest in deciding such matters.

None of Arpaio's managers were disciplined for failing to carry out the judge's 2011 order to stop the sheriff's immigration patrols.

In another instance, the judge found Arpaio's office conducted an inadequate internal investigation into the failure of managers to properly supervise a problematic sheriff's deputy. The deputy's theft arrest and subsequent suicide led to allegations that officers had pocketed personal items seized from people during traffic stops and busts.

"Nobody was held accountability for the misconduct that occurred in those investigations," said Cecillia Wang, one of the attorneys who pressed the profiling case against Arpaio. "It's definitely critical that people be held accountable."

Arpaio's office had no immediate comment Sunday on the prospect of some internal investigations being voided. The agency reiterated its earlier public statement on the contempt decision that said it was reviewing the decision, disagreed with some of the findings and would work to comply with the judge's orders.

A May 31 hearing has been scheduled to discuss ways to remedy Arpaio's contempt violations.

County officials also are scheduled to tentatively approve $13 million in spending in the coming year for the profiling case. Taxpayers have already spent $41 million in the case over the last eight years.

---

Follow Jacques Billeaud at twitter.com/jacquesbilleaud. His work can be found at http://bigstory.ap.org/content/jacques-billeaud.

© 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

HomeAbout UsSite MapContact UsCopyrightPrivacy Policy

SITE DESIGN:  HOLLIS BRAND COMMUNICATIONS