Baker City Herald | Baker County Oregon's News Leader

Baker news Yellow Pages NE Oregon Classifieds Web
web powered by Web Search Powered by Google
Oct 21, 12:04 PM EDT

NY court: Ex-ball boys can sue Boeheim for slander

Sports Video

Belmont Draw
Preakness Stakes Panorama
Preakness Draw
Kentucky Derby Panorama
Kentucky Derby Draw
Three Chimneys - Big Brown's Retirement Home
Belmont Announcer
Preparing Churchill Downs
Jockey Weight Problems
Latest News
Wise Dan out of Breeders' Cup with ankle injury

Buy AP Photo Reprints

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) -- New York's highest court on Tuesday reinstated the slander lawsuit filed by two former Syracuse University ball boys against basketball head coach Jim Boeheim.

Bobby Davis and Mike Lang say Boeheim slandered them in 2011 by calling them liars out for money when they accused his longtime assistant coach Bernie Fine of molesting them as children.

A judge dismissed the suit last year, ruling Boeheim's comments were not assertions of fact but opinions protected from defamation lawsuits. A midlevel court agreed.

Fine denied the allegations and never faced criminal charges.

The Court of Appeals ruled unanimously that they cannot conclude Boeheim's statements were "pure opinion" and that there's "a reasonable view" that Davis and Lang would be entitled to recover damages for defamation.

Attorney Mariann Meier Wang said the case will ultimately return to the state trial court in Syracuse, where the discovery phase can take six months to a year. "Now we get to prove our case and we get to prove that Bobby Davis and Mike Lang were sexually abused as children. We look forward to proving that and that Jim Boeheim made false statements that were defamatory and denigrating of them."

Attorney Helen Cantwell, representing Boeheim, referred questions to university spokesman Kevin Quinn.

"We are still reviewing the decision," Quinn said. "We understand that the case will now be returned to the trial court, at which point we will assess our options going forward."

Judge Jenny Rivera wrote that New York courts consider three factors in considering whether something is opinion where you cannot sue: whether the words have precise meanings and are readily understood, whether the statements can be proved true or false, and whether in the broader context and circumstances they signal to readers or listeners whether they are likely to constitute fact or opinion.

"Here, Boeheim stated that Davis and Lang lied and did so for monetary gain, and that Davis had done so in the past," Rivera wrote. "Boeheim's assertions that Davis previously made the same claims, for the same purpose, communicated that Boeheim was relying on undisclosed facts that would justify Boeheim's statements that Davis and Lang were neither credible nor victims of sexual abuse."

Rivera added that denying knowledge of facts or prefacing some statements by saying "I believe" were "insufficient" to transform his statements into pure opinion because a reasonable reader in context could still view his statements as supported by undisclosed facts.

© 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Local / Sports / Business / State / National / Obituaries / Submit News
Editorials / Letters / Columns / Submit a letter
Outdoors / Go Magazine / Milestones / Living Well
Classified Listings / Jobs / Place an Ad
Baker Herald
About / Contact / Commercial Printing / Subscriptions / Terms of Use
Also Online
Photo Reprints / Videos / Local Business Links / Community Links / Weather and Road Cams / RSS Feed

© Copyright 2001 - 2008 Western Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. By Using this site you agree to our Terms of Use works best with the latest versions of Mozilla Firefox, Microsoft Internet Explorer or Apple Safari